|
by Stephen Parezo
| Smart Brief |
- Banks require different standards for corporate governance so companies are
spending more for internal controls, software and hiring more auditors.
- Large
accounting firms are overwhelmed by SOX, making it harder for smaller businesses
to get serviced correctly.
- Section 410 of SOX presents some implementation
hurdles which can be costly.
- It's now more expensive for a small business
to get its accounting done.
- SOX fallout may hit small business as far
as financial statements are concerned since banking, insurance and bonding businesses
may have different requirements.
|
February 10, 2005When it was signed into law in 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act (SOX) sought to prevent
such high-profile accounting disasters as Enron and WorldCom from ever happening
again. Though SOX has become the benchmark against every company's financial and
corporate governance practices will be measured, dealing largely with publicly
traded companies, experts say some of its impacts are being felt by smaller businesses
further down the line. "People have said these things are starting
to filter down to smaller, non-public companies," said Gerald Leporte, chief
of the Office of Small Business Policy at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
"Banks are requiring different standards for corporate governance which has
increased as a direct result of Sarbanes-Oxley. People have started talking about
spending more for internal controls, software, having to hire more auditors and
higher D&O [directors and officers] insurance." Implementing some of
SOX's mandates is proving costly for some small businesses with their sights set
on going public. Private corporations such as those who do government work could
be liable for the products they sell under SOX. Hurriedly passed Industry
watchers like Marc Morgenstern contend that SOX was hurriedly passed by a 99-0
vote with "inadequate foresight." As managing partner of Kahn
Kleinman in Cleveland and a nationally known expert on securities and corporate
legal matters, Morgenstern says despite the rush to get SOX in place due to short-term
political pressure that there are some bright spots. "For instance,
there's an emphasis on independent directors, improved accounting controls and
an emphasis on independent audit committees that directly retain the auditors,"
he said. The bad news, he says, is that "the increased sense of caution
and risk aversion will ultimately affect everybody." According to Morgenstern,
many large accounting firms have been so overwhelmed by SOX that they have told
clients of 50 years that they can no longer accommodate them. The overflow of
clients is now going to regional accounting firms, making it harder for the truly
smaller businesses to get serviced correctly. There is also an element of
risk in earnings that includes data and information controls which carry a heavy
price tag. "The owner of a $5 million company must trust their own
judgment more than any system that they can afford to put into place," he
said. Morgenstern is heartened by the fact that in December the SEC announced
they would form a committee to look at SOX's impact on smaller companies within
a 12-13 month time frame. "I think the SEC and regulatory agencies
understand some of the unintended consequences of SOX and would like to make things
better," he added. "Their hearts are in the right place. The question
is how do you navigate through all the political stakeholders? Let's hope some
good significant changes come out of it." Speed bump The
U.S. Chamber of Commerce identifies accounting, auditing, corporate reporting
and corporate governance as part of its policy priorities for 2005. The Chamber
is promoting reasonable changes to current accounting standards and reporting
regulations but opposes unjustified rules and regulations. Giovanni Caratolo,
director of small business policy with the Chamber, says the implementation of
Section 410 of SOX presents some implementation hurdles for the nation's businesses. "This
requires that you have to actually set up procedures within your company to provide
checks and balances," he said. "These types of things can be very costly
especially if you have just one accountant." Caratolo noted that one
small business with 65 employees has spent over $1 million to ensure compliance
with SOX. But that's a cost that many small companies with their sights set on
higher brackets aren't always willing to pay. "If you are a small company
and your next step is to go public a lot of small companies are not making that
transition," Caratolo said. "It [cost] becomes a huge speed bump in
the road to growth." Comeback trail In recent years headline
grabbing scandals have given a black eye to the accounting profession's previously
above board reputation. For Fiducial's Tony Ambrosiano who serves as the company's
district manager in Dumfries, VA, those standards have never wavered. "We
maintain our high standards," he said. "SOX does target the larger firms
and I think it's almost sad that it's needed. Had the profession maintained the
standards of ethics that were in place that were the norm SOX wouldn't have been
necessary." While college students shied away from studying accounting
the last few years, the profession has been making a bit of a comeback as of late
with a marked increase in the number of accounting majors. Accounting graduates
are earning $50,000 or more leaving college which Ambrosiano says has driven up
the salaries for more experienced CPAs. "For the guy that's hiring
that gets very expensive," he said. "That's why we're seeing a lot of
bottom lines in CPA firms being squeezed out." Higher costs are also
being passed on to clients. "Pricing is a natural reaction to costs
but it's more expensive for a small business to get their accounting done than
it was years ago," Ambrosiano said. With the tax realm getting more
complex every year, he says small businesses are bound to run into trouble if
they try to tackle these areas on their own. "There's no way that a
small business can stay abreast of the tax laws and keep on top of it," Ambrosiano
said. "That's not their job. It's our job to maintain our knowledge of tax
laws. It's our job to maintain their books. You can't run a business effectively
without good numbers." Trickling down Fiducial has been
active on the acquisition front during the last several months, having acquired
a CPA and financial services network along with some successful individual accounting
offices. Bill Morice, Fiducial's director of field operations, spearheads the
company's acquisition efforts while ensuring that the new additions to the network
meet stringent guidelines. "We do full due diligence rather than relying
on a report from anyone," said Morice. "We send our own accounting and
IT experts in to do a valuation of whatever assets are there. We do our own tests
so we don't accept any statements they present to us because we're acquiring accounting
firms and CPA firms. Part of our due diligence is to see if the work they do for
their clients is in compliance with SOX and that there are no outstanding issues
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the state board
of accountancy including looking at their prior peer review records." David
Moore, a Fiducial franchisee in Fort Lauderdale, FL, expects SOX accounting governance
to trickle down to private corporations, especially those who do government work.
For example, he said if a private company that's responsible for manufacturing
specialized Kevlar vests experiences a malfunction with one of its products that
the company's board of directors will be held accountable. "Small businesses
selling products could then become more liable under Sarbanes-Oxley," he
said. One of Moore's clients has a company of industrial divers who inspect
cruise and freight ships for terrorist threats that come into the local port.
They perform a lot of their work using underwater cameras and must have the right
kinds of internal controls in place to avoid any serious consequences. Positive
step Bob Signorelli operates a Fiducial franchise in Oakbrook Terrace,
IL, and feels that small businesses like his won't see nearly the type of requirements
or restrictions that have been imposed on large public companies due to SOX because
his practice doesn't do any audits. "We don't do SEC audits or private
audits for a bank," said Signorelli who started his practice in 1981. "Pretty
much we do 95% write-up work, business consultation and reviews." In
his 24th year as a CPA, Signorelli does believe that some fallout from SOX may
start to hit small businesses as far as financial statements are concerned because
banking, insurance and bonding businesses "may have different requirements."
Overall, he expects these requirements to have a minimal effect on small companies. He
thinks Illinois will take a moderate stance on these issues but noted that in
2004 state regulators stipulated that professionals such as accountants, architects
and engineers need to be registered and fully licensed there by 2006. "They
probably did it for consolidation and manpower reductions but it's a good thing,"
he said. "It was a positive step for Illinois to do that." Before
he and partner Fergal Woods started up their Fiducial business in Boston a few
months ago, Michael Mulcahy was an internal auditor for a large bank where he
did a lot of control work. But he doesn't foresee these regulations ever touching
down on small companies. "Mom and pop operations are already accountable
for everything," said Mulcahy. "It will never filter down to that level."
Stephen Parezo is the Media Manager for Fiducial. Whatever
your small business needs, your Fiducial tax and financial professional can analyze
your situation and recommend an appropriate action plan. To locate a Fiducial
office nearest you on fiducial.com, see the Zip Code Locator located in the upper
right hand corner of the page. Do you have a particular topic that we should be
writing about that can help your business? Please send your suggestions to: stephen.parezo@fiducial.com. DISCLAIMER
Although we do our best to provide our users with useful and accurate information
on our web site, we do not update this information which is derived from sources
believed to be accurate. Users must understand that information presented does
not serve as an endorsement of any particular company or individual and that this
information changes frequently and is subject to differing interpretations. Users
are hereby advised that they are responsible for ensuring that the facts and general
advice obtained from our site are applicable to their specific situations and
should discuss their specific tax, business, financial, and legal matters with
pertinent professionals. |